4 thoughts on “Reponse from TMR re range road permits”
Thanks for trying Jamie. Sometimes, government departments are as immovable as that huge lump of rock that slid down of the hill (I’m not suggesting a Guy Fawkes type of action here though).
When making up the folder for the history display, may I suggest that you include your correspondence with TMR, interleaved with the updates in chronological order? When this is all over, and we’ve forgotten all the inconvenience and frustration, this folder will make very interesting reading.
🙂
Linda
Mmmmm……a little bit of stuff we already know.
But thanks for trying Jamie.
Agreed, Leonie.
Yes, the only thing that does not simply repeat the vague statements in previous TMR updates is the statement that engineering reports and risk assessments are not made public because they are too technical for our simple minds and would only confuse us.
Thanks for trying Jamie. Sometimes, government departments are as immovable as that huge lump of rock that slid down of the hill (I’m not suggesting a Guy Fawkes type of action here though).
When making up the folder for the history display, may I suggest that you include your correspondence with TMR, interleaved with the updates in chronological order? When this is all over, and we’ve forgotten all the inconvenience and frustration, this folder will make very interesting reading.
🙂
Linda
Mmmmm……a little bit of stuff we already know.
But thanks for trying Jamie.
Agreed, Leonie.
Yes, the only thing that does not simply repeat the vague statements in previous TMR updates is the statement that engineering reports and risk assessments are not made public because they are too technical for our simple minds and would only confuse us.